[Sentis]

gore3000 wrote"According to evolution the environmental conditions are indeed constantly changing "

No thats according to you no scientist said that the enviroment constantly changes you did. You give an example of seven to eight year rain cycle. Then give an example of adaptation to prove evolution doesnt occur? How do you possibly make a logical leap that evolution is false becuase animals can adapt? OF course you ignore my questions I asked you.


Just answer this one

How old is the Earth?

[gore3000]

You give an example of seven to eight year rain cycle. Then give an example of adaptation to prove evolution doesnt occur? How do you possibly make a logical leap that evolution is false becuase animals can adapt?

I stated exactly why the adaptation of the finches is not evolutionary in my post:

Another example is the Galapagos finches. The rains there are very variable. Remember the El Nino? Comes every seven or eight years? This causes constant changes and is the source of the increase and decrease in beaks in the finches. If forces them to constantly adapt back and forth. If evolution were true and these beaks changed due to mutations, they would not be able to do that. Because evolution is false and the finches's genomes are able to adapt the size of the beaks without mutation they can adapt to the periods of high and low rainfall which constantly occurs there.

Now the above clearly cannot be evolution, yet this is one of the two favorite examples of evolutionists for micro-evolution. The other favorite example is the moths and we know that that study was fraudulent. What this means is that evolutionists cannot even give proof of micro-evolution let alone give proof of the transformations necessary for one species to become a new more complex species.