[gore3000]

Creationists love to make the comparison between human art and the universe. I can name a couple of differences between the Sistine Chapel and the universe, even right off the top of my head and without having a picture of the Sistine Chapel in front of me!

I could probably name a few hundred also. However, the universe, by the judgement of scientists was indeed designed and the only alternative given by the atheists is the ridiculous infinite universe theory. This of course is Art Bell stuff, not science since no such thing has ever been observed and science is about observations. Complexity + specificity + purpose = Intellgent design in the Universe, in paintings, in life.

[Sentis]

gore3000 wrote "I could probably name a few hundred also. However, the universe, by the judgement of scientists was indeed designed and the only alternative given by the atheists is the ridiculous infinite universe theory. This of course is Art Bell stuff, not science since no such thing has ever been observed and science is about observations. Complexity + specificity + purpose = Intellgent design in the Universe, in paintings, in life."

Wow what a major logical leap. The judgement of scientists is not that the universe is designed where do you get this stuff. Science never observed the universe being designed so i guess that falls into your Art Bell category. Sorry your wrong again.



Here are some questions you must answer if you do not answer these questions you are not seeking any type of scientific debate you merely want to spred your false beliefs.


How old is the Universe?

Who created the Universe?

Where did this creator come from?

Which is the higher Law God's law or the Laws of Nature (science)?