Posted on 12/11/2002 6:28:08 AM PST by A2J
Oh, for the record, I never claimed my statement was an honest mistake. I said I wasn't a liar. Here is the text from post 1922. I know this is asking quite a bit, but you might try reading it carefully:
You're going to have quite a time climbing out of this hole, my amusing little demagogue.
No kidding? Which ones?
Because they want to pit religious people against each other. It's called divide and conquer, the method of all tyrants and oppressors of the truth.
[Scene of PH, tears running down his rosy cheeks, happily accepting the award.]
I want to thank my producer, my director, my parents, my friends, my fellow evos, my handlers at Darwin Central, the moderators ... but most of all I want to thank VadeRetro. I couldn't have done it without you, Vade!
I -- I'm totally disarmed. I'm so embarrassed at my silly jealousy.
[Exit sharpening dagger]
The original post claims that evolution is a fact. I have amply shown that it is not a fact and that evolutionists know that it is not a fact and that is why they refuse to give scientific proof of evolution or to discuss evidence disproving evolution. It is not about religion.
It is interesting that while evolutionists constantly attack Christianity they cannot find anything wrong with either Christ or the Ten Commandments.
There are no more mountains to climb. I think I'll devote the rest of my life to raising funds for my memorial library.
Seems to me that there is a big difference between the statement of ID that something was intelligently designed and the use of the antrhopic principle by materialists . ID bases its statement on scientific observations which point to the almost infinte impossibility of something not being designed. Materialists claim the antrhopic principle in spite of the scientific evidence for randomness and lack of design.
There is something else wrong with the anthropic principle - subjectivism. Eventually it relies on the idea that if a tree falls in a forest and there is no one around to hear it fall it does not make a sound. This is of course ridiculous and scientifically disprovable.
You can state that the moon is made of green cheese also, but that does not make it true.
What's more, Gore-be-tron™ is clearly in a bad mood today, now that his pal "medved," er, I mean, "piltdownpig," oops, I mean "sallymag," oh dear, I mean "titanmike," um, make that "nanrod," uh-oh, I mean "tallyho1946," rats, make that "annflounder" got banned from FR (for the seventh time).
No wonder he's having a temper tantrum.
You are within sight of a truly astonishing revelation. I wonder if you'll have the courage to follow it though? Could it be that a paradox does not truly exist?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.