Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: tallhappy
"Rum runner?"

Okayyyy. . . .

Kid is not his genetically.
The kid is not his.
Case closed.

Regarding the rest of your post, perhaps there are other people out there that can translate what the heck you are talking about.

Have a nice day.
27 posted on 11/29/2002 8:23:18 AM PST by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Gunrunner2
So genetics is all?

When you take responsibility for a child, the child is nothing? Not human? Just an object.

You returm it when you see it is the wrong brand name?

Pathetic, man, pathetic.

Some people know how God sets us apart from the animals. Some (eg rumrunning drunkards of the literal and figurative sort) don't.

I thank you for clarifying your position that a baby one might raise from birth is actually no more than a pair of shoes to you.

33 posted on 11/29/2002 8:29:30 AM PST by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Gunrunner2
Kid is not his genetically. The kid is not his. Case closed.

That's not the case in all states. In my state, if a child is born to a legally married man and woman, the child is legally theirs, and the husband is responsible financially for the child. I don't think that a paternity/support suit can be filed against the biological father in this situation.

CASE NOT CLOSED

36 posted on 11/29/2002 8:33:22 AM PST by WarEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson