[Morrigan]

To those of you attacking me earlier, I think you were misunderstanding me. Perhaps it is my fault for not making myself clear enough. I tend to be emotional when discussing children, because they are something I feel strongly about. I apologize if any of my heated posts offended anyone.

Two points I am trying to make here:

One: Men should not be financially responsible for children that are not biologically theirs.

Two: When a woman lies about the paternity of her children, the ones that ultimately suffer the most are the children.

People should do what is in the best interests of their children, even if it means they will go without. That is not called facism, it is called good parenting. Only biological parents need shoulder this kind of responsibility.

I hope that clears things up. And to the other questions: no, I am not a man, a feminazi, or gasp! Hillary Clinton. As far as medication goes, I am not on any now, but if I am going to post on FR with some of the people that post here, maybe I should be!

[BuddhaBoy]

When a woman lies about the paternity of her children, the ones that ultimately suffer the most are the children.

You cant make that claim.

No one can keep score about suffering. You dont know how a man might feel to one day have a child, and the next day have a cheating spouse and NOT have a child.

No one is denying that children suffer, but to place the interests of a child over those of anyone else IS FASCISM, like it or not.

People are people, regardless of age. Being young, cute and impressionable does NOT make one more important. As long as you espouse such thinking, you will always be in sync with Hillary. Like it or not.

[babygene]

Your OK.

I honestly didn't know from your screen name what sex you were. I apoligize for using Rush L's feminazi word.

Your views, after all of the emotions (on both sides) settled down, are not much different from mine or many others on this thread.