Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: babygene
I dont remember signing a birth certificate for either of my childeren. Of course that would have been over 30 years ago.

Since that's when child support begins, maybe the man should be required to sign the birth certificate or a DNA test gets done on all the possibilities.

165 posted on 11/29/2002 12:54:33 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: FITZ
Since that's when child support begins, maybe the man should be required to sign the birth certificate or a DNA test gets done on all the possibilities.

That is exactly what happens now. No man has to sign the birth certificate, even though he will be pressured to do so, if he shows up at the hospital. If the man refuses, there is nothing a woman can do, other than sue the man for support claiming parentage.

It is when the man doesnt know about the court date, and doesnt show up, that the woman recieves a default judgement against him, and then he is screwed. He must go to court and demand paternity tests. Only when they come back negative is he off the hook.

The point is; Fraud-committing mothers and Courts dont want paternity proven, they want it implied so that it can be assigned without delay. (for-the-children) Men should demand paternity tests ALWAYS no matter the harm it might do to the relationship. Better to spare relationships by making DNA tests mandatory. Courts and legislators are against this, because it will open a pandora's box that they would rather keep closed.

169 posted on 11/29/2002 1:04:51 PM PST by BuddhaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson