Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Clara Lou
Why not make it the man's responsibility to have her sign the paper.

That might work too. The man who doesn't want to support a child that might result, should present the woman with the paper and have her sign it before they conceive that child stating he will not be financially responsible for it.

13 posted on 11/29/2002 7:50:49 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: FITZ
This wouldn't work. Two people cannot conspire to take away the rights of a third (the newborn). The child is entitled to financial support.

IMO, it should be the biological father and mother unless other arrangements are sanctioned by a judge (ie, adoption, foster parents, etc.).

44 posted on 11/29/2002 8:50:46 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: FITZ
That might work too. The man who doesn't want to support a child that might result, should present the woman with the paper and have her sign it before they conceive that child stating he will not be financially responsible for it.

Better yet, any man or woman that doesn't want to support a child for one night of "fun" might be better advised to either keep their pants zipped up or make sure they use damn' good birth control.

When you play, eventually you pay.

Personal responsibility. Catch it.

223 posted on 11/29/2002 6:51:20 PM PST by usconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson