Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Satan Bound Today?
BibleBB ^ | Mike Vlach

Posted on 11/14/2002 11:56:40 AM PST by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720721-740741-760 ... 3,801-3,803 next last
To: the_doc
Saved!
721 posted on 11/27/2002 9:15:48 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 713 | View Replies]

To: Jean Chauvin
"Are they KJVOnlyist?"

If they're not they're hopelessly blinded by the revisionist heresy.

722 posted on 11/27/2002 9:20:16 AM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 665 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
It was the Catholics that took varing verses and put together the doctrine Dan....because as you know there is no definitive Trinity teaching to be found..
723 posted on 11/27/2002 9:21:19 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 719 | View Replies]

To: Jean Chauvin
I can see my slam dunk on that one really bothered you! I'll bet you still got voit dimples on your forehead. LOL.
724 posted on 11/27/2002 9:22:32 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 692 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody; RnMomof7; BibChr; fortheDeclaration; nate4one
What you believed about the mark of the beast is of little import.

The point is that you don't KNOW that it is "literal" or "figurative." You cannot speak authoritatively because you don't know.

I can tell folks to be on the lookout for either....can you?

Are you going to get the new computer chip implant put into you and your family so they can be identified whereever they might get lost?

Full preterists need not worry about that "chip." They believe this all happened in the early history of the church.

725 posted on 11/27/2002 9:27:39 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 699 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
The kingdom of God has come unto us.

Is that the total Kingdom? In it's entirety? Full-blown, complete, nothing lacking? Or is it, more likely, that aspect of the Kingdom of God which frees one from the strong man, as is referred to in this passage? I think you're talking Jesus' words to an extreme here, trying to have Him make an all-inclusive pronouncement when what He was doing was pointing out that by casting out devils, He was bringing the benefit of the Kingdom of God, in His person and authority, to those who experienced and witnessed the event. As the King of the Kingdom, in a real sense, anywhere He was (or is), the Kingdom of God was (or is), embodied in Him.

And how about this verse which flatly declares that the working of Satan is even right now currently bound by Him; that is, unless He has been taken out of the way:

No argument that there is a restraint of Satan as far as the scope of his activities now, by virtue of the fact that the Holy Spirit is still in this world, bringing souls to Christ, and Christians are by their very presence, salt in the world. Your mistake is in equating this with the binding in Rev.20. That is different, more complete, and not something that has happened yet, or is happening. The language used to describe the binding, the place of banishment, and the specific time duration of that binding and banishment is evidence that it is different than the restraint which is now currently placed on Satan. The language is specific, detailed, and sufficiently graphic to indicate that Rev. 20 is a separate event from what has gone before, in regard to Satan's activities.

You said "unless He has been taken out of the way". I take it you mean God's restraint, as the reading of this passage would seem to indicate. When, and under what circumstances, would this happen?

726 posted on 11/27/2002 9:29:44 AM PST by nobdysfool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 710 | View Replies]

To: the_doc
Ok, so I've visually organized the correspondence between John 5:24-29 and Rev 20 attempting to illustrate the parallels which you pointed out, as follows:
Correspondence John 5 Rev 20
John 5:24,25 describes a time coming of a spiritual resurrection, an 'era of regeneration unto conversion' to use the_doc's words, which corresponds to Rev 20:4,6 description of "souls" who did not take the mark of the beast - the 1st resurrection. 24 I tell you the truth, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be condemned; he has crossed over from death to life. 25 I tell you the truth, a time is coming and has now come when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God and those who hear will live. 4 I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or his image and had not received his mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years. 5 (The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.) This is the first resurrection. 6 Blessed and holy are those who have part in the first resurrection. The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for a thousand years.
John 5:28,29 describes a time coming of a phsyical resurrection (not spiritual but bodily) of everyone in their graves to be judged to life (heaven) or condemnation (hell), which corresponds to the dead of Rev 20:12 being judged at the white throne according to their works. This has been called by some commentators the '2nd resurrection', ostensibly as it corresponds to the '2nd death'. 28 Do not be amazed at this, for a time is coming when all who are in their graves will hear his voice 29 and come out--those who have done good will rise to live, and those who have done evil will rise to be condemned. 11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

However:

If John 5:25 describes a 'regeneration unto conversion' which corresponds to the souls of Rev 20:4 who didn't take the mark of the beast, where are all the other 'believing' souls who crossed over from death to life in the earlier era ('a time has come now') described in John 5:24? Where is the correspondence between John 5:25's era of the spiritually resurrected whose time has now come and the 1st resurrection of Rev 20? Or put another way, when do all the rest of the Christians get resurrected?

John 5:28,29 describes everyone in a grave (all who ever died) rising to be judged by what they have done which corresponds to the dead of Rev 20:12-15 the small and great, given up from death and hell, judged in Rev 20:12,13 according to their works, and whosever was not in the book of life receives the 2nd death. In both John 5:28,29 and Rev 20:12,13 everyone is judged according to their works and no one is actually mentioned as having been in the book of life. So, again when do the believing Christians get resurrected? Where are they mentioned?

John 5:29 says "those who have done good will rise to live", which implies saved by works and not by faith in Christ. This correspondence of the judgement according to works at the white throne in Rev 20:12,13 to the rising according to having done good or evil in John 5:29 only seems to reinforce the view that those in John 5:29 are also judged according to works. Interpreting John 5:29 was already difficult and corresponding it to Rev 20:12,13 increases the difficulty.

So to sum up my questions, from the Amillenial viewpoint, when do the already dead believing Christians get bodily resurrected and found in the Book of Life, according to faith in Christ, not of works?

 

727 posted on 11/27/2002 9:33:53 AM PST by Starwind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 697 | View Replies]

To: drstevej; xzins; nobdysfool; BibChr; fortheDeclaration
"How come you posted #666? Let the amils have that one"

They'll have it when it counts!

Amillenialism is clearly part of the Strong Dellusion that the Lord has promised, and it is deluding many that consider themselves part of the Very Elect.

728 posted on 11/27/2002 9:35:17 AM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 681 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Your probability theory on the Church and Israel is similar to what my neighbor, a member of The Way International, says about the Trinity.

He contends that of the 60 odd verses in which Christ speaks about himself only a couple of those verses may be construed as Christ saying he is God. Therefore, he contends, Christ is not God.
729 posted on 11/27/2002 9:36:39 AM PST by lockeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 719 | View Replies]

To: the_doc
"Just seconds before I hit the "post" button, my PC locked up, and I lost the entire essay."

Clue:
Use 'notepad' or your word prosser to compose long posts, and then 'clipboard' them over to the posting window.

730 posted on 11/27/2002 9:38:52 AM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I can tell folks to be on the lookout for either....can you? ~ xzins Woody.
731 posted on 11/27/2002 9:40:08 AM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 725 | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty
***The Way International***

Those guys still around? Been a while since I have run into them. Attended one of their services in the late 70s in Dallas. It was like an Amway pep rally (apologies to Amway).
732 posted on 11/27/2002 9:41:05 AM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 729 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
What?! There most certainly is abundant Biblical teaching on the Trinity! And "the Roman Catholics" only systematized the doctrine if you agree to call everyone living after 200 AD a Roman Catholic -- as if they believed the same as statue-worshiping/necromancing/salvation-earning RCs today.

Dan

733 posted on 11/27/2002 9:45:09 AM PST by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 723 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Well, ES, all I have to say is that unlike you, I don't think that any of us Amills have pronounced all the dispys to be reprobate.
734 posted on 11/27/2002 9:47:57 AM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 728 | View Replies]

To: xzins
What you believed about the mark of the beast is of little import.

I have NEVER believed in a LITERAL mark..not ever..it is a lie (deception)from the pit of hell

735 posted on 11/27/2002 9:47:58 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 725 | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty
No connection, insulting try. Christ is called God, in so many words, again and again and again and again.

What an insulting connection to make to defend an indefensible mistake that should have been corrected centuries ago.

Dan

736 posted on 11/27/2002 9:50:01 AM PST by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 729 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Those guys still around?

The group is still around but badly splintered. Their 'prophet', Victor Paul Wierwille, died a few years back. His successor has been sued for sexual harrassment and he purged the group of those who opposed him. From my limited research in the group Wierwille embraced the charismatic movement and they are basically a 'name it and claim it', 'gab it and grab it' movement. Like any other cult Wierwille had complete control and when he died the group splintered but there is apparently still a remnant.

737 posted on 11/27/2002 9:52:38 AM PST by lockeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 732 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
What?! There most certainly is abundant Biblical teaching on Amillennialism! And "the Roman Catholics" only systematized the doctrine if you agree to call everyone living after 200 AD a Roman Catholic -- as if they believed the same as statue-worshiping/necromancing/salvation-earning RCs today.
738 posted on 11/27/2002 9:52:58 AM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 733 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
No insult intended.

Just trying to ascertain when 'probability theory' is appropriate in hermeneutics and when it is not.
739 posted on 11/27/2002 9:57:52 AM PST by lockeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 736 | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty
Not a surprising series of developments. Thanks for the update. In the 80s I counseled with a couple who had tried to make a break from that group. The pursuit by the other cult members ultimately was a factor in their divorce. She wanted to go back out of the guilt they piled on her. He wanted nothing further to do with them.
740 posted on 11/27/2002 10:06:45 AM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720721-740741-760 ... 3,801-3,803 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson