[Aurelius]

"That was the same Union that he urged an 'immoveable attachment'to"

But I think he would have been absolutely revulsed by the notion that such attachment would have been maintained by force.

"I guess I just wonder how they could respect him more than you do. Didn't he do anything noteworthy in your eyes?"

Don't you bother to read before you respond? I told you, I have great respect for George Washington, I just don't believe that he was infallible. So both of the premises of your questions are false. Like Non-Seq, you continually set up straw men.

[Non-Sequitur]

Leave me out of this, please. It's between you and Walt.

[WhiskeyPapa]

"That was the same Union that he urged an 'immoveable attachment'to"

But I think he would have been absolutely revulsed by the notion that such attachment would have been maintained by force.

I-M-M-O-V-E-A-B-L-E

He was ready to use force against rebellion in Pennsylvania. And in his proclamation on such, he called the action of the rebels there treason.

Walt

[WhiskeyPapa]

Don't you bother to read before you respond? I told you, I have great respect for George Washington...

For what? Holding slaves?

Walt