Replies

You are so fixed on Ricci committing this crime. Why?

You are so fixed on Ricci being innocent. Why? The last that I heard he was still at the top of the SLPD/FBI list of potential suspects in the case. Do you have a problem with LE in this matter? Sherlock is doing a service to remind those who may be casual readers as to what was hashed out before. Many of us who are in the "suspicious of Ricci" crowd aren't posting right now because there is no new information to go over. If you or anybody else in the "lovers of Ricci" crowd come up with something worth hashing then maybe we'd jump back in.

The last I heard they feel that Ricci Knew something about the case. That does not mean to me that he is guilty. He may be guilty but it is odd how they can't get anyone to say he did it, rather it be forensic or witness. Note- Moul is the Neth repair shop owner NOT Ricci's mechanic.
Ricci was involved in a drug ring and a big one at that, he had "weed" farms all over these mountains. FBI was very busy this summer burning them. The FBI/LE are still gathering up and arresting people, (I find it interesting being in utah and know who really ownes a certain resturant that was closed down for drug sales, you can't live in utah and not know about a mob gang (I am not; the only one that knows this)). Yes, Ricci did really bad things and should have never been paroled but so did 399 others get paroled just for the sake of saving money, they should be in jail at this very minute. I do also find his death highly questionable especially when one states 'maybe that will scare him and make him talk.' 'Scare him''make him talk' two things I would question 1- why was it so important that someone gets into the court room that Ricci was in court for on unrelated charges and then that night he (as told on news alert) had sustained numerous injuries and was taken to the infermatory, these numerous turned into one then none????? (sound like stories we have read on the ES case.) To give someone an aneurysm it only takes giving a person a shot with it only full of air. 2-why would anyone say maybe that will scare him and make him talk? Was there an arrangement of somekind or were some police officers upset that Ricci was still walking around after shooting a cop and felt he was now guilty of kidnapping?
Many questions on many other things that Ricci did or didn't do. This doesn't exactly mean a Smart involvement either. I wonder if we were to look anyones life on that day if half of them would look highly suspicious to us.
I find it interesting that even though Ricci died no one has come forward to give information about Ricci and that he did it. Money is involved, people are greedy and would talk if they knew something. They don't. Why? No matter what you look at on this case it leads you right back to the house. What is everyone missing? or what are we missing the LE already know?

Also Please Note: Posters keep talking about how when a Smart is interviewed that they always Look right into the camera and adress Elizabeth by name and tells her they love her and that they are still working on trying to find her.
They have been instructed to do this. This makes it a personal note to Elizabeth but more importantly to the KIDNAPPER. They tell them to do this so that Elizabeth isn't a object or trofy that she becomes a real person with feelings and emotions and family ties. That is why Lois would tell personal stories and show her pictures. This works on the brain of the Kidnapper and can confuse them and brings the guilt of there actions to the surface and hopefully realizes what there doing and turns themself in and if the victim is alive frees them. This type of psychology will happen everytime a child is taken. A good note to yourself is if the family doesn't do this it most likely shows their involvement because they don't want their guilt to show through. Thusly, it helps LE decipher two things. If there is family involvement or to spread guilt into the kidnapper.

Most seem to think Ricci did it or Smart did it. All I can say is get out of your comfort zone and look at the case again. I know others have been looked at but each of us seem to only point the finger at these two what is the third answer. I think it could be someone that Ricci didn't know they were doing it and also that Ed didn't know about but the two of them knew this person perhaps.

Remember, I am on Elizabeth's side and no other side. I am just trying to make us think. Perhaps we just might have the best clue seeing how everything has been stated on this forum like no other forum. We may not know exactly what LE knows but I bet we are close. Also don't always believe what is printed in papers you might make yourself gollible.

Why did YOU have your posts removed from this thread? It's very suspicious. I do have a problem with LE in this matter. I am suspicious of them as well. I don't trust LE. Why should I. There is no new news to go over? Tell that to Sherlock. He is putting up all the old stuff!