But you say, it's not Theft if the State Outlaws the property.
So how was it "theft", if the State had Outlawed the property-ownership in question??
Be specific -- how was it "theft", if the State had Outlawed the Ownership in question??
Also the government did not treat the Jews as they would be treated. Two commandments broken. The Nazis treated the Jews as they would not be treated.
Also, you do not treat those who become intoxicated on Private Property, as you would like to be treated.
For example, a Yemeni Muslim would outlaw your beer, but permit the herbal intoxicant khat, an amphetamine-like euphoriant and stimulant. You would turn the tables, and outlaw khat while permitting beer.
What do you both have in common?
Your both in favor of violating the Golden Rule -- breaking into people's houses and putting a gun to their heads to prevent Private Intoxication.
A state ordained of God.
So how was it "theft", if the State had Outlawed the property-ownership in question?? Be specific -- how was it "theft", if the State had Outlawed the Ownership in question??
The Nazis weren't of God.
Also, you do not treat those who become intoxicated on Private Property, as you would like to be treated.
Yes. I subject myself to the same laws as everyone else.
For example, a Yemeni Muslim would outlaw your beer, but permit the herbal intoxicant khat, an amphetamine-like euphoriant and stimulant. You would turn the tables, and outlaw khat while permitting beer.
I won't live in Yemen.
What do you both have in common? Your both in favor of violating the Golden Rule -- breaking into people's houses and putting a gun to their heads to prevent Private Intoxication.
I'm willing to live under the same law that I vote for.