God said the old covenant is no more.
If you are going to rely on this "uproot the tares" argument, then please explain why prosecuting people for the obscure "pharmacus" reference you have provided is justifiable, but prosecuting the highest sin (infadelity to God) is not?
God specifically told us to leave people alone in their beliefs. God did not specifically tell us not to enforce the law on private property.
Would you not be uprooting the tares by prosecuting people for intoxication? Do you realize that by your own logic, the Constitution can't possibly be ordained by God since it forbids such disregard for property?
We are allowed self defense through civil law. Laws against drug dealers are self defense. We are not directly threatened by those that believe wrong in most cases.
Do you really believe that you as a private citizen are authorized to enter your "un-neighbor's" house in order to make a citizens arrest for the crime of pot-smoking or intoxication?
Depends on what the civil laws on search and siezure are.
Depends on what the civil laws on search and siezure are.
Ok..good grief. Where does the constitution and the declaration of independence say that the "just powers" of Government originate?