I'm talking to you IF you choose to *feel* that this article "slanders people".
This article refutes Romish dogma.
Romish dogma is the subject --- not *the people* who believe the Romish Dogma.
If you think that the article is not successful in it's refutation of this dogma --- provide your proofs.
If you continue to attack the *person* because you don't like what the person is saying, then I'm sorry, but I will catagorize you in the same camp as those who called Jesus names because they couldn't refute his words.
Sorry. That's just the way it is with those capable of objective critical thinking.
Waving bloody shirts is not "objective critical thinking." It is the basest tribalism. It has no place in a reasoned discussion, which this is not.
SD