This is a trick question. Since "the cup" was actually the crucifixtion, he should have gnawed on the cross.Well, Jesus never told us to eat literal pieces of lumber... but He did tell us to carnally drink and digest His literal, organic Blood and carnally gnaw and digest His literal, organic Bodily Organs, right?
So... if John had positioned himself under the arms of the cross-bar and begun suckling and swallowing the dripping human blood as it fell; and if John had asked the soldiers for a piece of the muscle tissue stripped from Jesus' back, chewed up the torn human muscle and swallowed it down...
Question:
- John's action would be Morally Virtuous.
- John's action would not be Morally Virtuous.
Which is it?
Well, Jesus never told us to eat literal pieces of lumber... but He did tell us to carnally drink and digest His literal, organic Blood and carnally gnaw and digest His literal, organic Bodily Organs, right? So... if John had positioned himself under the arms of the cross-bar and begun suckling and swallowing the dripping human blood as it fell; and if John had asked the soldiers for a piece of the muscle tissue stripped from Jesus' back, chewed up the torn human muscle and swallowed it down... Question: John's action would be Morally Virtuous. John's action would not be Morally Virtuous. Which is it
<> I can't imagine having this sort of hatred and yet still claim to be Christian. This post is an example of the hatred that arises when the Calvinists gather. It is sick, twisted, mephitic, repulsive and indefensible. <>