"Only by ignoring the defense testimony could the jury come up with this verdict of guilty."
I thought the prosecution had shot themselves in the foot enough times (family life style, crazy dogguy, and hours of proof that DW did exactly what he said he did that weekend) to create "reasonable doubt" without the defense. The jury had to ignore lots of prosecution testimony, like the two bug guys paid for by the state.
It was the steering committee (aka the media circus) Mudd is a FOOL if he thinks the jurors weren't influenced by it.
On the SND site... UPDATES... in the Trial Evidence section...
Trial Exhibits 41-60, 61-80, 81-100
Closed Hearing Summaries 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9
http://users3.ev1.net/~2ntense