I am
not going to post personal information about someone, so you can forget that route. Just for the sake of argument, thought, let's say this person failed a urine test. That failure resulted in the person being returned to prison. Since there is only one thing that can cause a urine test to show positive for cannabis, and that would be consumuing cannabis. And please, I'm in no mood to go into the legal distinction between smoking pot and eating it.
Cause = smoking pot
Effect = prison
What could be more plain?
I am not going to post personal information about someone, so you can forget that route.If the convict was sentenced - (at least) twice - that ain't personal information - it's public information and is probably posted somewhere on the internet. A last name may do the trick.
Just for the sake of argument, thought, let's say this person failed a urine test.
Oh, my. I nailed it - didn't I? The convict came up positive after a golden flow. Darn the luck - but your convict wasn't busted for "smokin' pot." He got busted for being dumb enough to piss in a cup - while on parole. He was sent up the river - again - because of lab results.
Your friend is a complete idiot. (And not just one of those little ones. I'm talkin' GIANT here...)
So far, we've got the UCMJ having imprisonment provisions for smoking pot.
NEXT!