How about - "As far as I know, ironically, there is no law that prohibits smoking marijuana."
Say, aren't those YOUR words?
Say, aren't those YOUR words?
Since you're too lazy or incompetent to remember or too lazy to reread the thread I'll post several pertinent posts. BTW, Still waiting for you to post your profound insight.. or whatever it is you were (are?) reveling in. LOL!!
You sure poked a touchy libertarian nerve.
The Liberteens have no idea what's comin'.
Please leave me in my revelry...
166 posted on 9/21/02 11:36 PM Eastern by Libloather
To: Libloather
As I said, "I won't post the information I have until you post your profound wisdom you are reveling in." Go ahead and post away. Don't forget to flag everybody that was waiting on you to post but got bored and left.
288 posted on 9/22/02 2:35 AM Eastern by Zon
To: Dakmar
Dakmar to Libloather: The only thing I would even attempt to explain to Zon and Stew is why I even bother responding to your nonsense. 253
Not to worry. I told LL over on the thread he migrated from to start this thread, that as far as I know there are no laws against the smoking marijuana. Of course, in my original post on this thread (19) I said the same thing.
270 posted on 9/22/02 1:35 AM Eastern by Zon
To: Libloather
"As far as I know, ironically, there is no law that prohibits smoking marijuana."
That quote was from me to you over on this thread: Drug Czar on Anti-Marijuana Crusade. (An interesting juxtaposition between myself and liblother.)
IMO, it is a misnomer that smoking marijuana is prohibited by law. As far as I know there is no law that prohibits smoking marijuana. There are laws prohibiting possession of marijuana.
In a court of law the distinction is critical. One act can result in a court trial, the other doesn't. One act can result in being sent to prison, the other can't.
This forum is not a court of law and it is logically assumed by the vast majority of people that in order to smoke marijuana a person must have marijuana in their possession.
You appear to be making a very petty argument.
19 posted on 9/21/02 9:19 PM Eastern by Zon
To: Libloather; KDD
You two goobers have an open forum and fail to show up? Kinda lame - no?
Earth to Libloather...
Apparently you have the memory span of a gnat. I showed up long ago and made several posts. Two of those posts were to you. Once again you have digressed to calling people names.
134 posted on 9/21/02 11:17 PM Eastern by Zon
To: Ken H
hb-- LL's question is a riddling game rather than a serious topic of debate.
As far as I know, there is no law against smoking MJ and therefore no one has been charged with or jailed for such an offense.
People do use the terms smoking and possession interchangeably. LL thinks he has stumbled onto something profound by pointing out the inaccurate mixing of the terms.
Several people have said basically the same thing. Doing that even prior to Libloather's #166 post. IMO, he has a Grand-Canyon sized blind spot or he's "shnockerd" (drunk) out of his mind. On the other hand, perhaps he's stalling in hopes of coming up with some revelation that will extricate himself from the hole he dug.
You sure poked a touchy libertarian nerve. 140
Libloather: The Liberteens have no idea what's comin'.
Please leave me in my revelry...166
229 posted on 9/22/02 12:33 AM Eastern by Zon
To: Libloather
As I said, "I won't post the information I have until you post your profound wisdom you are reveling in." Go ahead and post away. Don't forget to flag everybody that was waiting on you to post but got bored and left.