Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: secretagent; realpatriot71
With the desire apparently so strong for precision, "inference" doesn't make the grade. realpatriot71 did not state that he thought the law had imprisoned anyone for smoking pot, contra your linked page.

Using your Clintonian word parsing abilities, one could say that I never claimed he said marijuana possession was an arrestable offense, either.

285 posted on 09/21/2002 11:03:12 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]


To: Cultural Jihad
Using your Clintonian word parsing abilities, one could say that I never claimed he said marijuana possession was an arrestable offense, either.

No parsing on my part. You linked to a page that didn't support your claim.

BTW, I request that we refrain from personal attacks.

301 posted on 09/22/2002 6:59:32 AM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]

To: Cultural Jihad
Ok smart guy, I'd like to point out that you can be arrested for any ticketable offense (Atwater v. Lago Vista), so I can be arrested for smoking a joint in my house.

You've lost it kid . . .

305 posted on 09/22/2002 1:59:24 PM PDT by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson