To: Roscoe
"A carefully planned and well-financed campaign to overhaul Michigan's drug laws crashed Tuesday, as the state Supreme Court declined to place the issue before voters in November."
....because of an accidental technicality in the language of the proposal. It called for a Section 24 to be added to the State Constitution, but there was already a Section 24. This legal technicality was the only reason the issue was rejected for consideration.
Interesting how you chose to completely gloss over that topic. Of course, telling the whole story is anathema to New Dealer Socialists like yourself.
To: WyldKard
but there was already a Section 24. What would have happened to it?
349 posted on
09/13/2002 7:43:12 AM PDT by
Roscoe
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson