Skip to comments.
Drug laws won't be on the fall ballot, but tobacco money will
Detroit Free Press ^
| September 11, 2002
| DAWSON BELL
Posted on 09/11/2002 4:55:57 AM PDT by VA Advogado
Edited on 05/07/2004 7:12:39 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
A carefully planned and well-financed campaign to overhaul Michigan's drug laws crashed Tuesday, as the state Supreme Court declined to place the issue before voters in November.
Without comment, the court upheld decisions issued last week by the Court of Appeals and a state elections panel to keep the drug question off the ballot.
(Excerpt) Read more at freep.com ...
TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 361-377 next last
To: Roscoe
"Laws against illicit drugs exist at the federal level and in all fifty states." roscoe-pap
Unconstitutional prohibitory laws against 'illicit' drugs exist at the federal level and in all fifty states.
Clearly, intoxicating substances can be 'regulated' at local & state levels, as long as the constitution is not violated.
- Fiat prohibitions violate due process. See the 14th.
281
posted on
09/11/2002 3:04:26 PM PDT
by
tpaine
To: tpaine; Twodees
You two are typical hate mongering fanatics, who mock the principles of our constitutional free republic.
Looks like you got stomped little boy.
To: Dane; Dead Corpse; tpaine; headsonpikes
You forgot Cheech and Chong, IMHO.
Cheech, chong, Tpain, Deadcoprse. What a collection. The contemporarty libertarian braintrust.
To: VA Advogado
Whata dreamer.
284
posted on
09/11/2002 4:18:33 PM PDT
by
tpaine
To: VA Advogado
Wow, devastating ripostes VA.
285
posted on
09/11/2002 4:21:07 PM PDT
by
tpaine
To: VA Advogado
Look, you mealy little twerp. Go back to your mindless bureaucratic tasks, such as they may be, and do not interrupt me with your yawpings again.
I am prepared to debate and argue with willing compadres at any time; you do not qualify.
I can get into shouting matches with braying socialist jackasses any time of the day or night right here in Vancouver. I have no need to carry on useless discussions of that nature online.
Go back to your fetid den at Rat HQ, troller.
To: headsonpikes; Roscoe; Dane; Zon; tpaine
I am prepared to debate and argue with willing compadres at any time; you do not qualify.
Ok, just tell me when pot, crack or heroin has ever saved a life.
To: headsonpikes; Roscoe; Dane; Zon; tpaine; Hemingway's Ghost
Ok, just tell me when pot, crack or heroin has ever saved a life.
The fact that it saved Hemingway's marriage doesn't count.
To: tpaine
Fiat prohibitions violate due process. See the 14th
You haven't the slightest idea what the 14th amendment is and what it does. Go back to your libertarian coloring books.
To: VA Advogado
Another 'devastating' opinion by FR's premire lightweight mind.
Stick to your vapid comments on 'stomping'.
290
posted on
09/11/2002 5:23:30 PM PDT
by
tpaine
To: VA Advogado
Gee, for a moment there I thought you were outnumbered, but than I saw there were only four of them.
291
posted on
09/11/2002 5:46:04 PM PDT
by
exnavy
To: Dane
JMO, but it seems to be you who is out of the loop. You're right about the JMO part because you're the only lunatic on your side who still buys this crap.
Comment #293 Removed by Moderator
Comment #294 Removed by Moderator
To: VA Advogado
The libertarians on this thread are as much america haters as al-qaeda.
You are a cowardly piece of sh*t. Anyone who would post something like this (above) on this of all days isn't fit to scrape the dogsh*t off my shoe. If I get banned for saying so it's worth it because it needed to be said, although I'm sure others have said it more forcefully and colorfully than me in the past.
You are as bad as---no, worse than---any bleeding heart liberal navel gazer who wraps himself up in some nebulous feel-good soundbite in order to promote his or her petty little political agenda. Do a search for the Derrick Z. Jackson column I posted today, because you're him wearing a "conservative" mask. People like you are the reason the word "conservative" means what it does to lefties and "moderates" everywhere. And you discredit the otherwise good people on FR who for whatever reason support the federal War on Drugs. My side may have ideological differences with them, but only you sink to this detestable level.
I'm sure you've got a raging one-inch hardon in your pants now, because flaming on FR is all you do. You have nothing else to add. Zero. Nothing. I couldn't muster any more contempt for you if I tried.
Comment #296 Removed by Moderator
Comment #297 Removed by Moderator
Comment #298 Removed by Moderator
To: Bill D. Berger
Just tell me when a shot of whiskey, a glass of wine or a bottle of beer has ever saved a life?
Those might be relevant items if they too were illegal. Try again Billy.
To: Hemingway's Ghost
I'm sure you've got a raging one-inch hardon in your pants now, because flaming on FR is all you do. You have nothing else to add. Zero. Nothing. I couldn't muster any more contempt for you if I tried.
Is pot really good for divorce? I have a buddy on the force that's having some marriage trouble. Should I recomend some panama yellow or some hash?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 361-377 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson