Replies

BVW, ..questioning other people's conclusions is NOT the same thing as saying he's guilty. The character issue, the blood, dna, fibers, hair and child porn..all totalled a big finger pointing at DW.

red's right..that was a defense tactic of the clinton defenders. People who thought that clinton was a typical horny stud, who said it was no big deal that he could get bj's under the desk while on the phone with what's his face trying to decide whether he was going ot send our boys to war...are beyond all hope. Disgusting. (see starr report for confirmation)

My opinion about the definition of horndog is not indicative of belief of guilty of kidnapping and murder. It's just one of many things.. (although it wasn't brought up in trial, so therefore really doesn't count)..like some of the stuff spewed about the vd's...it doesn't count cuz they weren't on trial.

A mother knows her son very long and deeply and may speak overly casually about something that she'd be more circumspect about regarding other men in similar situation. A mother may overemphasize a trait that to outsiders seems normal, because a mother has expectations of a son that she has of NO other males. It may be, and seems to me to be that Westerfield's mom may have wanted him to be some eunuch or celibate monk. So that when she called him a "horndog" it just meant he was a normal functioning member of the male gender.

And that btw is what I mean by "horndog", and also what Nature's God has provided by way of sex. The primal Man, Adam, was inconsolably lonely without a mate -- so the Creator made one up for him. We are men and not animals, controlling and utilizing in the best way, that sexual impulse is not beyond us.

Yet every guy is a horn-dog.