To: pinz-n-needlez
Having the victim's blood on your clothes gets you convicted.
But then again, I guess you also defended OJ.
To: Luis Gonzalez
Does it matter when, or how the blood got there, or how much is there?
Does it matter if the forensics people never did the definitive test to see if it was really blood or if it was 'bare' dna?
Does it matter that the jacket was handled by a LEO, who has a record of falsifying evidence, before the forensic techs received it?
I never said I defended OJ. But you can jump to any conclusion you wish, it's a free country, sort of.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson