[Luis Gonzalez]

"The point is that the prosecution did not PROVE DW's guilt beyond a REASONABLE doubt."

Not to you maybe, but to me and the jury it was guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The majority of the pedodefenders that populate these van Dam threads wouldn't have been convinced of guilt, even if they would have been present at the time of the murder.

[bvw]

Yours is a typical argument from your "side" -- whatever does one call the side of ignorance and stupidity anyway. It hardly forms up a side -- just a group of slugs in slow brownian motion around Nancy Grace's lip gloss.

Here is your argument:

• "Pedodefender" -- the sure logic of name-calling.
  
• "wouldn't have been convinced even if they would have been present at the time of the murder." -- the spice of calling and different judgement ridiculous. "Join or we'll ridicule you mercilessly".

And that is the sum and span and beam of it! No more ...

[Guenevere]

#1655....That's a low blow, Luis Gonzalez!!

We are NOT defending pedophiles.....

What a horrible thing to say...
....Truly horrible!

I am pro-death penalty....but I happen to believe this guy is not who did the crime.
...Why does our opinion bother you all so much!!!?

[pinz-n-needlez]

"even if they would have been present at the time of the murder. "

If just one such witness came forward, we wouldn't have this mess, now, would we?

And the persons with the best shot at identifying that moment have apparently been ignored. Such a dilemma. In the meantime, we're all left with either witty remarks or meaningless insults to pass the time.

When, where, and how do you think she came to be dead?