[Valpal1]

Ya know, they had like, 65 officers on this case from day 1. If you think they didn't check the SO's in the area, you need to adjust your tinfoil. Your right, only DW had physical evidence of the victim on his property.

You think Ted Bundy "started" with kidnap and murder? It's called escalation. Did Avila kidnap and murder his first victims. No he MOLESTED them and they are alive to tell about it today. That jury didn't believe them either, because they waited too long to tell.

The sad thing is that if DW hadn't been given a pass on this incident, he would have a record, and there would be no arguement, was he/wasn't he a pedophile/molester.

[UCANSEE2]

If you think they didn't check the SO's in the area, you need to adjust your tinfoil.

Yep, they interviewed the VD's , their friends, the neighbors, and interviewed all 70 molestors in the neighborhood, and searched every one of their houses all in 48 hours.

Sorry, I do not believe they could have done a very thorough search in that time.

Why didn't they investigate the UNKNOWN PRINTS, the UNKNOWN DNA on Danielle's bean bag chair, and compare it to the database of all known offenders?

Why were the investigators ORDERED not to use a 35mm camera on the jacket and carpet stain (as they are TRAINED TO DO) and told just to use a junky old Polaroid camera?

[Freedom2specul8]

"The world is full of crime victims who regret their false sense of security. Dulled senses and judgement due to partying is plausable"


NONE OF US CAN DENY THIS NOW MATTER WHICH SIDE YOU'RE ON.

[Freedom2specul8]

NOTHING LIKE SCREWING UP THE MESSAGE WITH A MISspelt WORD.

"deny this NO matter which side you're on"