Again, I would ask of you and others, Does an incident that may have occurred 12 years ago, make you guilty of murder in the present? That is what you and others seem to be getting at.
I would agree that PROOF of SEXUAL MOLESTATION, especially if it occurred recently, would go to MOTIVE in this case, especially if it could have been proven that Danielle was molested/raped.
Since none of this is true, what you are seeing going on now is being done for this reason:
The media, CTV, Nasty Grace, Paul Pfingst, the SDPD, San Diego, all noticed that as the trial proceeded, more and more people thought DW wasn't the real killer. That as more children ended up dead, and an INTERNATIONAL PORN RING was discovered in their neighborhood, with POLICEMEN,TEACHERS, CHILD/FAMILY COUNSELORS/LITTLE LEAGUE COACHES as the main members of this CHILDPORN RING, that people were starting to see through the SMOKE and MIRRORS paraded in court.
If people continued to doubt, and they didn't NIP IT IN THE BUD, people might investigate, continue asking questions and find out just HOW BAD DW was being railroaded. That the DA and SDPD were covering up for making a mistake in originally picking DW as the perp.
SOOOOOOO, now we parade in this 'incident' and try to get the public to SWAY in favor of the death penalty. Then everyone will forget about it and move on. This is what the DA and the SDPD want. KEEP MOVING, DON'T WORRY ABOUT the TRUTH.
YOUR CHILDREN ARE NOW SAFE (well, except from their teachers,priests,policemen/policewomen,swinger friends,dope dealers,Child/family counselors and Little league coaches)