That is certainly possible and is what the Prosecution implied.
TO have this happen, means Danielle was alive in the MH. HOW LONG? Where did this assault occur? Would a person intent on assault and murder not tie up their victim? How long would he have driven around with her in the back?
We have been over these questions over and over in the past, and it is like a puzzle.
The prosecution had 3 pieces of the puzzle that seemed to fit. They then had 197 other pieces that didn't fit. So, they crammed some together, and sawed on others until they fit. Now, looking at the finished puzzle, the picture on it doesn't make sense. But, The jury was told that the picture doesn't really have to make a good picture. If it has some colors and kinda forms the shape the puzzle was supposed to end up in , IT'S OK, HE's GUILTY.
Now at the penalty part of the trial, we have more puzzle pieces that don't quite fit, being sawed and hammered to try and get them in place. You tell me where and when DW killed Danielle and why the dogs couldn't track her scent in the MH, and then I would have reason to believe he committed the crimes.