To: UCANSEE2
You are correct, it was testimony...and wasn't disproven and I suppose it wasn't proven?
I would assume that when the investigators looked at it, they would have seen that it was chewed up or tore up..
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I would assume that when the investigators looked at it, they would have seen that it was chewed up or tore up.. Assuming what you want without proof is what you say I and others do. Show me where the LE ever looked at the tore up dog bed. Please, I would love to see it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson