[dread78645]

Second, I don't recall a 21 theorem ?

Dusek's closing argument : cheating at 21 ( blackjack ?).

[VRWC_minion]

Dusek used the cheating example at playing cards to describe that evidence is looked at in its entirety and not picked at individually like those here have done which led them to erroneous conclusions. Dusek's example was apparently effective.

I still don't see how I was wrong.