I could be wrong, but What I got from the testimony was that we are SUPPOSED to believe the hair was FOUND in the LINT TRAP/U-TRAP of the MH. The 'expert' that found it (not the first time, but on a second go around after OTT and KEYSER had had time to plant more evidence) said he found it. When questioned about EXACTLY where, the expert responded with a non-denial denial answer, saying something to the effect of "If it had been in the sink, then that Is where I would look to find it."
He did not admit (to my knowledge) that IT WAS in the TRAP. Just that the TRAP is where he was SUPPOSED to FIND IT.
DNA, don't matter. HAIR, don't matter.
Print, Don't matter.
2 dogs search MH for Danielle's trace, VD house for DW's trace. First one SDPD canine. After he gets NO HITS, BEST FBI DOG in the country searches both. NO HITS.
CASE REOPENED for FURTHER SEARCH FOR KILLER. DW INNOCENT.