Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Dave_in_Upland
Can anyone tell me if the forensic tech took a picture of the hair she supposedly found in the drain in the MH? From what I have read of her tistimony it was not in the 'U trap' but in the sink basin itself.

I could be wrong, but What I got from the testimony was that we are SUPPOSED to believe the hair was FOUND in the LINT TRAP/U-TRAP of the MH. The 'expert' that found it (not the first time, but on a second go around after OTT and KEYSER had had time to plant more evidence) said he found it. When questioned about EXACTLY where, the expert responded with a non-denial denial answer, saying something to the effect of "If it had been in the sink, then that Is where I would look to find it."

He did not admit (to my knowledge) that IT WAS in the TRAP. Just that the TRAP is where he was SUPPOSED to FIND IT.

65 posted on 08/19/2002 7:45:18 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: All
BOTTOM LINE:

DNA, don't matter. HAIR, don't matter.

Print, Don't matter.

2 dogs search MH for Danielle's trace, VD house for DW's trace. First one SDPD canine. After he gets NO HITS, BEST FBI DOG in the country searches both. NO HITS.

CASE REOPENED for FURTHER SEARCH FOR KILLER. DW INNOCENT.

67 posted on 08/19/2002 7:48:15 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2
HE should probably be SHE in the HAIR case.
68 posted on 08/19/2002 7:49:26 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson