Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smoking Ban Held on Court Action (Prosecutor Refuses to Enforce Pending Ruling)
Wheeling (WV) Intelligencer ^ | Aug. 17, 2002 | Jennifer Compston

Posted on 08/17/2002 7:00:48 AM PDT by mountaineer

Prosecuting Attorney Herman D. Lantz has announced he will not criminally enforce the Marshall County Clean Indoor Air Regulation while similar issues in other counties are pending before the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals.

In a statement issued Friday, Lantz stated it has come to his attention that some Marshall County businesses are complying with the smoking ban while others are not. As a result, the county health department has sought the assistance of the prosecutor's office in enforcing the regulation. In his statement, Lantz pointed out that while health department is not accountable to area citizens, the prosecutor's office is ­ prompting him to offer an explanation to the citizens of Marshall County regarding the position his office has taken on the issue.

According to Lantz, questions have been raised regarding whether the local health department and its governing body, the Marshall County Board of Health, have the authority to create such a regulation, "which has the same force and effect as law.'' He pointed out that other lawmakers and officials such as the county commissioners, state and federal legislators and the prosecutor all can be removed from office by a vote of the people if a majority of the voters have been dissatisfied with their performance. This is not the case, however, with members of the board of health, who are appointed by the county commission.

"This is called democracy,'' Lantz stated in reference to the election of lawmakers. "This is what people have given their lives for in the past and even now ... are putting themselves in harm's way to protect.''

He continued by explaining that a similar clean air regulation implemented in Cabell County currently is being contested before the state Supreme Court. He added that any court action related to enforcement of Marshall County's regulation could, as a result, be stayed until the Supreme Court rules on the Cabell County case.

"I do not know how the Supreme Court will rule on this issue, but I feel it would be premature, unfair and irresponsible to enforce a regulation that may be held unenforceable,'' Lantz stated. "It is my opinion that even if I were to choose to bring an action against violators of this regulation, the proceedings would merely be stayed until the Supreme Court has issued their opinion on this issue. Clearly this would not be the best use of judicial resources.

"Therefore, until such time as the Supreme Court issues its opinion in the case currently pending before it, as Prosecuting Attorney, I will not criminally enforce the smoking ban.''

Lantz added, however, that if the Supreme Court finds the health department has the authority to create such a regulation, it will be his duty to enforce the local regulation.

"Just as I have a duty to represent the citizens of Marshall County, I have taken an oath as prosecuting attorney to uphold the law, and I will do so,'' he stated. "I can assure you that I will proceed in enforcement in the fairest manner to the citizens of Marshall County.''

Lantz stressed that the announcement of his current position on this matter is not intended to encourage anyone to violate the regulation.

"In that respect, the citizens of Marshall County and would-be violators should be aware that, in the event the Supreme Court finds that the health department has the authority to create such a regulation, I will have no choice but to enforce the regulation as of its enactment on July 1,'' he added.

Anyone having question regarding enforcement of the smoking ban should contact Lantz's office at (304) 845-3580. Lantz noted, however, that he will be out of his office from Monday through Aug. 29 for his annual Air Force Reserve Training.

Lantz also stated he will notify the people of Marshall County as soon as possible after the Supreme Court reaches a decision.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: pufflist; smokers; smokingban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Max McGarrity; Gabz; SheLion
I'd say yes, too. What's new on the rumor going around on the perps thinking about collecting tribute on internet tobacco sales?
41 posted on 08/19/2002 8:35:00 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound
Thanks, SheLion. I knew if anyone knew, you would be the one. WHO studies should be labeled, "WARNING! BELIEVING THIS REPORT WILL CAUSE SEVERE DAMAGE TO YOUR ABILITY TO DISTINGUISH FACT FROM FICTION, BUT WILL QUALIFY YOU FOR MEMBERSHIP IN OUR SELECT GROUP OF CONTROL FREAKS."

What the WHO will release, is a "REVISED" version, in other words [Spin.]

42 posted on 08/20/2002 7:19:57 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Great Dane
Hi, Great Dane! Spin is right. I can't tell you how frustrating all this is. It just wants to make me go out and buy a couple of more pounds of tobacco.
43 posted on 08/20/2002 8:28:26 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound
Marty Meehan is doing his best to drum up support for it. We gotta let that ol' boy know we're out here and if he values his place at the trough, he'd better back off. Workin' on it, Eastbound. Too much to do and too little time.
44 posted on 08/20/2002 11:04:59 PM PDT by Max McGarrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: agitator
Ping!

According to Lantz, questions have been raised regarding whether the local health department and its governing body, the Marshall County Board of Health, have the authority to create such a regulation, "which has the same force and effect as law.'' He pointed out that other lawmakers and officials such as the county commissioners, state and federal legislators and the prosecutor all can be removed from office by a vote of the people if a majority of the voters have been dissatisfied with their performance. This is not the case, however, with members of the board of health, who are appointed by the county commission.

"This is called democracy,'' Lantz stated in reference to the election of lawmakers. "This is what people have given their lives for in the past and even now ... are putting themselves in harm's way to protect.''

He continued by explaining that a similar clean air regulation implemented in Cabell County currently is being contested before the state Supreme Court. He added that any court action related to enforcement of Marshall County's regulation could, as a result, be stayed until the Supreme Court rules on the Cabell County case.

Is this what you're talking about,ag? Laws v. regulations?

45 posted on 08/26/2002 3:34:49 PM PDT by kennyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson