Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rising number of Americans refusing life-saving blood transfusions because they come from vaccinated donors
dailymail ^

Posted on 04/03/2026 9:43:27 PM PDT by algore

Health researchers are sounding the alarm after noticing more people refusing life-saving blood transfusions because they come from vaccinated donors.

In a study out of Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 15 patients or families of patients who needed blood transfusions rejected them because they requested blood from donors who were not vaccinated.

The majority of patients were children or teenagers.

The refusal led one patient to go into shock, another to develop anemia and others to have their surgeries delayed.

Now, doctors involved say they fear more Americans, spurred by vaccine-suspicious health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr, will follow.

Over a two-year period, the researchers found requests for non-anonymous - meaning patients can choose specific donors for their transfusion - had increased because the patients specifically wanted blood from unvaccinated individuals.

The patients had told doctors they wanted unvaccinated blood because they believed it was safer, but their exact safety concerns are unclear.

Researchers noted that while the total number of these donations was small, the requests caused delayed care and could have contributed to complications of not receiving a timely blood transfusion, which can include organ failure, stroke and death.

Some anti-vaxxers also believe receiving blood from a vaccinated donor will cause them to suffer the serious but extremely rare side effects associated with the shot, such as a kind of heart inflammation called myocarditis.

The misinformation has come as RFK Jr has expressed doubts about the safety of Covid vaccines and referred to the shot as 'the deadliest vaccine ever made.'

However, there is no evidence that being vaccinated against Covid or any other vaccine-preventable illness alters the blood in any significant manner. Blood centers also do not track the vaccination status of donors.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: coronavirus; darwinawards; pureblood; smokybackroom; spikeprotein
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-149 next last
To: algore

There should be a separate blood bank for people who did not take any of the covid jabs.


101 posted on 04/04/2026 9:40:45 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

Are the blood stocks kept vaxxed/unvaxxed separated?

If not, WHY NOT?


102 posted on 04/04/2026 9:52:34 AM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Finish the damned WALL! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

T.B. Yoits wrote: “They are experimental, by the manufacturers’ own claims. THEY claimed the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) because it is experimental. If it was “full and complete”, they wouldn’t need the EUA.”

Please stay informed. The EUA has been recinded and the Pfizer-BioNTech (Comirnaty) full FDA approval (BLA) for individuals 16+ on Aug 23, 2021, and later extended to younger age groups.


103 posted on 04/04/2026 9:56:11 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

T.B. Yoits wrote: “Again, it’s not a vaccine, regardless of what the CDC, the pharmaceutical korporations, and their globalist cohorts changed their definition to.”

It is a vaccine regardless of the anti-vaxxer propaganda.

T.B. Yoits wrote: “And yes, just like Mengele, it was an deadly experiment done on human beings without their consent. The Nuremberg Code was written to condemn exactly what these people did.”

Unlike Mengele, the vaccines saved millions of lives. No one was forced to take the vaccines. Anti-vaxxers didn’t like the alternatives to taking the vaccines but it is absurd to compare the vaccines to experiments performed by Mengele.

Your attempts to portray the covid vaccines to nazi Germany are exactly the same as those attempts by progressives to compare Trump to Hitler.


104 posted on 04/04/2026 10:02:11 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: RideForever

RideForever wrote: “Your first mistake was calling a genetic treatment that changes your DNA to add a ‘protein spike’ a ‘vaccination’.”

You’re making the same mistake the anti-vaxxers made when the smallpox vaccine was first developed. They claimed then that the vaccine would change you into a cow. You are just as ill-informed as they.


105 posted on 04/04/2026 10:05:07 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Worldtraveler once upon a time

Subscribe to keep reading

No thanks.


106 posted on 04/04/2026 10:07:30 AM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Finish the damned WALL! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
the vaccines saved millions of lives.

You have zero proof that the Jim Jones Jab saved even one life. Zero.

No one was forced to take the vaccines.

Just wow. What a blatant lie. In addition to the force applied, ranging from loss of employment, pensions, parental rights, travel, live saving health care treatments including organ transplants, etc., the Jim Jones Jab was physically forced on children and the disabled. That's irrefutable. They're on video injecting them against their will.

Anti-vaxxers didn’t like the alternatives to taking the vaccines but it is absurd to compare the vaccines to experiments performed by Mengele.

Absurd? ...because they didn't like the alternatives? The term, put right there in the camps was "Arbeit macht frei" ("Work makes one free") - You either work under these horrific conditions or we exterminate you. Yeah, that's not force; that's offering "an alternative".

In this case it was "You either accept this injection rape of an experimental gene treatment or we will deny you an organ transplant."

Your pfascism is in full view now. Thank you.

107 posted on 04/04/2026 10:19:00 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Forcing experimental treatment on individuals was specifically addressed in the permissible experiments section of the Nuremberg Code in 1947.

"The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:"

"The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision."

"The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity."

"The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury."

"Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death."

"The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment."

"During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible."

108 posted on 04/04/2026 10:19:43 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

109 posted on 04/04/2026 10:21:19 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

110 posted on 04/04/2026 10:21:42 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits
Ut oh ... you're posting facts, now ... that'll stir up the various shills hornets nests.
111 posted on 04/04/2026 10:22:15 AM PDT by Jane Long (Jesus is Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: algore; Jane Long; DugwayDuke
From a year ago...

Expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in cerebral Arteries: Implications for hemorrhagic stroke Post-mRNA vaccination

...SARS-CoV-2 spike protein persists in cerebral arteries up to 17 months post-vaccination...

From 2024...

COVID-19 Spike Protein Persists in Brain Tissues for Years

People are still getting vaxxed.

And I'm still wondering about the safety of the nation's blood supply.

112 posted on 04/04/2026 10:26:54 AM PDT by mewzilla (Swing away, Mr. President, swing away! 🇺🇸 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla; Jane Long; algore; DugwayDuke
Oh, boy...

Also from 2024...

Long‐lasting, biochemically modified mRNA, and its frameshifted recombinant spike proteins in human tissues and circulation after COVID‐19 vaccination

If you're in a hurry, from the conclusion...

...The persistent nature of mRNA coding for SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein provides a dangerously long exposure to an unlimited dose of this pathogenic protein, and thus, it needs re‐evaluation for continued human use. We have provided the molecular basis for a wide distribution of injuries, disabilities, and deaths resulting from spike protein‐related diseases, which derive from ill‐advised continued use of these products. Understanding the above overarching proteomics and deutenomics mechanisms, especially in cell growth and transformation, 25 in modified mRNA vaccines‐related severe adverse events is necessary for a scientifically informed benefit/risk evaluation of such vaccinations.

Bold is mine.

113 posted on 04/04/2026 10:32:17 AM PDT by mewzilla (Swing away, Mr. President, swing away! 🇺🇸 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

mewzilla wrote: “COVID-19 Spike Protein Persists in Brain Tissues for Years - People are still getting vaxxed. - And I’m still wondering about the safety of the nation’s blood supply.”

The article from the EMJ doesn’t say the things you think it does. Here’s the lead in two paragraphs from the EMJ article:

“DATA have revealed that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein persists in brain-protective tissues and skull bone marrow for years post-infection, potentially driving long COVID neurological symptoms, though mRNA vaccines reduce this burden by 50%.”

“A groundbreaking study has revealed that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein can remain in the skull’s bone marrow and brain-protective tissues, such as the meninges, for up to four years after infection. This prolonged presence may lead to chronic brain inflammation, accelerating brain ageing and increasing risks of neurodegenerative diseases and strokes. Importantly, the study highlights that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines significantly reduce the accumulation of spike protein in these regions, providing crucial, though incomplete, protection against long-term neurological effects.”

IOW, being vaccinated protects you from the spike protein in your brain tissue.


114 posted on 04/04/2026 10:47:49 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

T.B. Yoits wrote: “You have zero proof that the Jim Jones Jab saved even one life. Zero.”

You have no proof that the vaccine didn’t save lives.

T.B. Yoits wrote: “Just wow. What a blatant lie. In addition to the force applied, ranging from loss of employment, pensions, parental rights, travel, live saving health care treatments including organ transplants, etc., “

You may not have liked the consequences but the fact remains you could decline the vaccines. Mengele did not offer that choice to those subject to his experiments.


115 posted on 04/04/2026 10:56:58 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

The Supreme Court is hearing arguments in United States v. Hemani, related to federal law banning gun ownership for marijuana users. 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(3), part of the 1968 Gun Control Act, bars firearm possession by anyone “an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance.” Because marijuana is still federally illegal, that covers every cannabis user in America regardless of state law.

The case got to the Supreme Court after the Fifth Circuit struck down the ban as applied to Ali Danial Hemani, a regular marijuana

If I were a christian in a country founded by christian I might argue that I have a religious exemption

Genesis 1:29 And God said, “Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit

It always seemed pretty clear to me.


116 posted on 04/04/2026 11:06:02 AM PDT by algore ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: algore

CV19 Vax Causes Explosion in Cancer – Dr. Betsy Eads
https://usawatchdog.com/cv19-vax-causes-explosion-in-cancer-dr-betsy-eads/


117 posted on 04/04/2026 11:17:49 AM PDT by Tom Tetroxide (Psalm 146:3 "Do not trust in princes, in the Son of Man, who has no salvation.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

Didn’t Clinton buy blood from prisons?

Who knows what they received from the donors.


118 posted on 04/04/2026 12:52:47 PM PDT by Vaduz (NEVER TRUST A DEMOCRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
---- "Subscribe to keep reading No thanks."

But, but, but it's not only the Daily Mail, but it's the special M+ Exclusive Daily Mail.... / sarc

119 posted on 04/04/2026 2:23:38 PM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Yeah, I believe it was a ‘back-n-forth’ with accept/reject/accept.

I’m not even sure what it is now, I stopped donating after their first acceptance of tainted blood.


120 posted on 04/04/2026 3:14:26 PM PDT by Bikkuri (I am STILL a PureBlood (no Poison WuFlu-jab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson