“I have seen no evidence that cursive brings any particular cognitive or learning benefit beyond that brought by hand printing,” wrote Mark Warschauer, a professor of education at the University of California, Irvine”
Typical egghead liberal response.
How about DICIPLINE dipsht?
He must have missed multiple studies showing otherwise.
But probably in the next paragraph this “educrat” would defend it as teaching an “ART” if it was called the “Basics\Foundations of Calligraphy”.
Cursive should be taught and practiced in grades 1-6 as much as for training brain-eye-hand coordination. Call it PE then if you don’t want to call it literacy.
Cursive for discipline? That’s funny.