[ducttape45]

Here's how I see things. Any woman can be beautiful, period. My problem with actresses is that they either "over-glamorize," they go under the knife and come out looking like the Joker, or they are so covered in tats that they are unrecognizable. Very few actresses stay true to nature and age gracefully. Rachel Weizs is one such actress.

That said, yes, Sydney Sweeney is a beautiful young lady, but I've also seen pictures of her that are totally horrendous, and that holds true for all actresses, all females.

[linMcHlp]

Rachel Weizs

[Mr Rogers]

She’s pretty in some pictures and not so pretty in others. FWIW, I thought the same of Audrey Hepburn, who definitely was NOT “well endowed”! I tend to think slender women or women whose breasts and hips are larger than their waist are able to be pretty. Most athletic women seem pretty to me.

Fat women, or women with enormous hippo-butts? Hideous!

Low standards perhaps. Still, higher standards than most American women try for, since the average American woman is 5’3” and 170 pounds! Sigh....and a 39 inch waist.

Of course, American men - 5’9” and 200 pounds - aren’t that way due to huge muscles. More likely due to the 41 inch waist.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/body-measurements.htm

[Rummyfan]

Audrey Hepburn…. Ingrid Bergman…. Sophia Loren….

[Celtic Conservative]

Rachel Weisz has had extensive olastic surgery, about 10 years ago. It’s not obvious now because time has softened the harshness of it.

CC

[MinorityRepublican]

they go under the knife and come out looking like the Joker

I think Sweeney went under the knife and had some work done. It's a little subtle but you can notice it.

I'll prefer Tom Cruise's plastic surgeon. He looks good. And natural. Even though it's clear that he had work done. Others, you can usually tell. And most of the time, they look "fake". Some of them end up looking like the Joker, as you said.