You failed to prove the requirement that you listed, and you failed to list your credentials that allow you to list such as a requirement.
So before you tell me that I don’t know what I’m talking about, make sure that you know what your talking about, because you look real foolish now.
Furthermore, what difference does this person’s politics make as to whether or not a crime was committed against him?
Do you think the defense attorney of the accused man is going to offer the victim’s political viewpoints as a defense of his actions?
Do you think the jury will accept the mans’ being a lunatic left winger as a mitigating factor?
Hmmm?
Seems that they already have him on his stated intent and act of transmission, per 18 USC § 2261A(2), depending on the statutory definition of “interactive computer service.” No seizure required, just “substantial emotional distress.”
For the assertion to be made that the tweet in question made the left-wing lunatic have a seizure , would it not be fair to say he that he had to cast his eyes upon the tweet in question ? I’m not a doctor but common sense would say that he had to stare at it long enough to cause a seizure ...I still think that the left-winger is lying about having a seizure but you go ahead and continue to vigorously defend him , as it’s you who looks foolish ...
Do you have the same empathy towards Trump supporters that are being assaulted and beaten all around the country ? The left plays for keeps and here you are defending one of them , nice work ...