Posted on 05/23/2015 5:30:48 PM PDT by PapaBear3625
Nuclear power plant technicians, senior military officers, FBI contractors and an employee of “a highly-secretive Department of Defense agency” with a Top Secret clearance. Those are just a few of the more than 100 people with sensitive military and government connections that law enforcement is tracking because they are linked to “outlaw motorcycle gangs.”
A year before the deadly Texas shootout that killed nine people on May 17, a lengthy report by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives detailed the involvement of U.S. military personnel and government employees in outlaw motorcycle gangs, or OMGs. A copy of the report was obtained by The Intercept.
The report lays out, in almost obsessive detail, the extent to which OMG members are represented in nearly every part of the military, and in federal and local government, from police and fire departments to state utility agencies. Specific examples from the report include dozens of Defense Department contractors with Secret or Top Secret clearances; multiple FBI contractors; radiological technicians with security clearances; U.S. Department of Homeland Security employees; Army, Navy and Air Force active-duty personnel, including from the special operations force community; and police officers.
(Excerpt) Read more at firstlook.org ...
LOL! Talking to yourself again?
To: don-o
What is the “overt act”?
I asked you first.
754 posted on 206 PM by don-o
I recommend you read this book:
No, you.
Of your cadre, you seem like the more decent human being.
I asked you to specify what is the “overt act” that underlies the charges. When and where did those 170 detainees conspire? If they have evidence of such, these people should have been already locked up.
Unfortunately, or not, ISIS members are fully human. They are not, however, US citizens (possible rare exceptions).
It is an evil regime, and their atrocities are well documented. They are at war with Western civilization, and other Muslim sects. Eventually, they will meet a strong opposition, until then their barbary is poorly checked.
Is this really confusing to you?
I have no problem calling them filth, scum, trash, turds, animals. You feel I should show more respect toward goat-humping terrorists?
“I asked you to specify what is the “overt act” that underlies the charges.”
Murder and assault. As listed in the affidavits.
What I object to is calling American citizens sub-human in order to justify trampling of their rights.
ISIS was in Waco? Who knew? Have you stopped beating your wife?
“Unfortunately, or not, ISIS members are fully human. They are not, however, US citizens (possible rare exceptions).”
So you believe that governments give people rights ...
Answer the question.
People call meth-dealing criminal gang members subhuman scum because that's what they happen to be. If you want to have "Mister" prefixed in front of your name, don't be a criminal drug dealing lowlife subhuman POS.
Nope - governments do not give rights, human rights precede government.
Governments should, but many don’t respect the rights of man. Sometimes governments use labels such as sub-human to justify their crimes.
Knock off the Delphi BS. I am not going to explain everything to you, you fascist.
“ISIS was in Waco?”
Maybe. But we have a lot of photos of gangsters with Nazi SS tattoos in Waco.
“Nope - governments do not give rights, human rights precede government.”
Then why do you infer that U.S. citizens have more rights (the rights to life, liberty, and happiness) than non-citizens?
According to you, no due process for drug dealers or gang members.
How very statist of you.
Thank you, but I will try to keep my constitutional republic.
“Thank you, but I will try to keep my constitutional republic.”
The Bandidos deprive thousands of good bikers of their constitutional rights every day. No concern for that?
I didn’t.
The case we are talking about though is in the USA. A constitutional republic that has a bill of rights. Have you heard of it?
To call any group of human beings subhuman filth make that a legitimate category. Then, it’s simply left to those with the most power to decide who belongs in that category.
Do you know any history at all?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.