Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: IronJack
Secondly, a number of Southern states had asked the federal government to remove its forts from their property under threat of violent takeover.

Isn't that, like, an act of war?

30 posted on 04/02/2015 5:39:52 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

“like” NO.


37 posted on 04/02/2015 6:34:32 PM PDT by Phosgood (Send in the Clowns...but Wait, they're here!! >..<)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

Their being there were acts of aggression against the states. They were there by the grace of the sovereign states, and when that grace was no longer granted, the feds had to make a decision: would their right to remain, even where not wanted, overrule the right of the states to protect their domains?

In choosing to place the rights of the federal government over the rights of the states, the “Union” became less a voluntary republic than a centralized tyranny. The conflict was as old as the country itself.


38 posted on 04/02/2015 6:42:21 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson