Just keep it up. It’s not going to change hearts and souls, do you understand that? I just finished browsing your posts from the last six months, and all that talk about furry animals and movies didn't change anyone's heart or soul. Besides being pro-life, what are your political views that you think make you a conservative?
I’m not sorry if I think abortion is the most diabolical cruelty in this world and is the #1 issue that must be stopped. If being pro-life, anti-government oppression, adamantly pro-second amendment, and a woman of Hispanic descent who abhors illegal immigration and amnesty isn’t enough to be considered conservative, then no wonder some folks here can’t decide who’s righteous enough to be a true Christian.
Talking about movies, food and kitties is a way to be friendly with people; it’s a way to get people to know you as a person. But if you prefer to communicate with people by wagging your finger at them for wearing rosaries, then by all means, continue to show the world how uber-conservative you are!
I just finished browsing your posts from the last six months, and all that talk about furry animals and movies didn't change anyone's heart or soul. Besides being pro-life, what are your political views that you think make you a conservative?
Alex, the above is your reply to the original poster of this thread, who says "[your commentary and image regarding a "
bitter opus" is] not going to change hearts and souls..."
At this site both "furry animals" and "movies" have been mentioned as an aid to help (heal) one's heart and one's soul. That being said, what concerns me most about your commentary (at both links), is that it reveals condescension toward a woman, a lack of chivalry if you will.
It seems, in general on this site, it would help if the religion moderator responded more like a knight. For instance, recently on a
thread, "goodwithagun" at
#36 said she didn't want to answer to "daniel1212" but he still pesters her for several posts thereafter, until finally, a religion moderator steps in at
#68 and then continues on to admonish
goodwithagun at #69 as well.
It was a good thing GWAG wasn't hanging from a tower by her hair and on fire. I was always under the impression that chivalry and conservatism went hand-in-hand.
For a man to respect a woman
completely, he must first love Our Lady, Christ's Mother. And that is why I believe the main religion moderator on this site is not a Roman Catholic, or at least not a happy devout one, which of course could lead to bias in his decisions, but somebody's got to do the job, I also understand this.
As far as yourself, I've seen several times you've encouraged debate from Catholics (by way of anti-Catholicism type commentary), and is that really a good thing to do on a conservative site where we are being called upon in serious fashion to try to save [as Christians] the liberal nation we are being forced to upright?