HMMMmmm...
Posted on 06/04/2014 9:51:45 PM PDT by boatbums
Some folks are easily confused...
I told you before 5 sentences or less, I stopped reading after “Bullshit” since everything after that was probably an outright lie.
Or you could stay in the Religion Forum where you will be protected from hearing the truth about the outright lies you prots tell.
Leave the bondage you're in and cross the Tiber.
Come to Jesus and serve Him only.
Luke 4:8 And Jesus answered him, “It is written, “‘You shall worship the Lord your God, and him only shall you serve.’”
Then you shall know the Truth and He shall make you free.
You know what they say about people who make ASSumptions.......
You’ve proved it true again.
Only BD is not included in the group. It’s yours to bear.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/3171476/posts?page=4
The thread that I started from the Catholic League opening up the grave hoax story like a can of worms was ignored by you and Boatbums, and the rest of the haters. The reason? You can’t refute facts.
The truth of the matter is FR is loaded to the gill with Catholic-hating liberals.
“You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they?
Matthew 7:16
“haters”, playing the victim card, running to the mods, etc.
Why do these tactics ring a bell??? hmmmmm
Yeah, well we know who runs whining to the mods the most with their precious little feeling hurt.
And it isn’t the ones who aren’t name calling.
Can’t admit the truth so change the topic, typical moronic prot. Like I said might better to stick with the RF then you are protected from the truth of your stupidity.
Here's a thought why don't you go back and finish that degree that you didn't have the wherewithal to finish instead of getting your butt kicked here.
Probably?
You won't touch it (for it touches upon your own personal error, even sins) but make assumptions concerning it.
You can't handle the truth. And it judges you, too.
Please keep telling all how smart you are.
Please pardon this additional note -- but that allegation also came from ONE source, and has been for the most part refuted, for the man says otherwise in other interviews....
There was one single uncorroborated "story" where a single writer claims that he interviewed this same witness -- and got "only twenty or thirty" is pretty thin.
In a later interview with the man who opened up the site in '72 (I listened to a recording) he said his friend (who was 14 years old at the time) had gone into the structure (whatever it was) and that it was 8 or 9 feet deep and about twenty feet square, and that it was full of bones heaped in a pile, and there being very many -- though he did not say exactly how much, but if memory serves, the "20 or so" reported in the one article, was well enough refuted, as far as I could tell.
In that interview, he also mentioned seeing cloth or rags though (as in remains of burial shrouds, it is assumed) which does differ from previous reporting which had left readers picturing the deceased infants being put into this structure (whatever it really is) totally naked.
Other anecdotal witnesses claim to have seen small cloth-wrapped bundles, presumed to be bodies of infants having been lowered into the ground by several nuns, and a 'workman" of sorts, on one occasion.
Those together indicate well enough for me to assume the bodies were wrapped in cloth -- which is "decent" burial custom, and does indeed refute one of the original erroneous bits of info.
As to the number of infant bodies alleged to have been seen by the witness who opened the site in the 70's, I saw that one item which claimed "only 20 or so" in it's original form, and again, it is a single article which is in conflict with other available information, coming more directly from this same witness.
That aspect is what prompted me to write this addendum to the last note of discussion.
Thank you for your patience. I hope..
Jesus answered, “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.”
Apparently SOME of us can...
HMMMmmm...
Excellent link and article. Thank you for a breath of fresh air on this otherwise fetid screed.
What LIES??? What lies have I been “caught with”? Have you even BOTHERED to read through this thread and seen where I acknowledged the new information that came in after this article first appeared? No, you didn’t, because all you want to do is blame, castigate, denigrate and condemn non-Catholic Christians because they dared comment about atrocities such as this as well as the MANY others perpetrated by Roman Catholics under the auspices of their “church”. You would prefer the whole world ignore hundreds of years of hard truth in order to maintain the fantasy that your church is the only, true church Jesus established when all the evidence to the contrary stacks up. It’s called DELUSION and HYPOCRISY. Wake up!
Spoken like a true Catholic Church hating liberal.
Like I already said here, the anti-life crowd can point to things like the Tuam home to demonstrate the hypocrisy of those who claim to be Pro-life. It sends a message that we don't care what happens AFTER a child is born as long as it is saved from abortion. It affects ALL of us who fight for the right to life of all innocent human beings. I must say I am disappointed in the reaction from some here who cannot see this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.