Replies

Two months later President Reagan signed into law the National Minimum Drinking Age Act, designed to keep persons below age 21 from purchasing alcoholic beverages."

With all due respect to the family and supporters of the late President Ronald Reagan, the National Minimum Drinking Age Act is another federal law which Reagan should have vetoed. He should have vetoed it because, regardless that Constitution-ignoring FDR's actvist justices argued that the Commerce Clause powers gave Congress wide powers, Justice John Marshall had previously officially clarified that Congress has no power to regulate intrastate commerce, a reasonable interpretation of the Constitution's Commerce Clause, Clause 3 of Section 8 of Article I.

”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress. [emphases added]” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

In fact the 18th Amendment is an example of the states delegating such power to Congress, that amendment prohibiting the intrastate manufacture and intrastate sale of intoxicating liquors. Note that the states later repealed the 18th Amendment with the 21st Amendment.

"On May 21, 1984, President Ronald Reagan signed into law the Child Protection Act, which was supposed to protect persons younger than 18 from exploitation by pornographers."

There may be a problem with respect to the author's reference to the Child Protection Act of 1984, possibly wrong year or title. I cannot reference it.

Child Protection Act of 1984

Otherwise, if the Child Protection Act likewise regulates intrastate commerce, then Reagan shouldn't have signed that one either. Again, only the states can regulate intrastate commerce unless they amend the Constitution to grant Congress the power to regulate a specific aspect of intrastate commerce.

Getting back to possible problems with the so-called CPA of 1984, where did I left-click when I should have right-clicked?

As a side note to the Reagan presidency, please consider the following. Although his intentions were undoubtedly good, Reagan is an example, imo, that even conservative presidents have not necessarily been taught the federal government's constitutionally limited powers as the Founding States had intented for those powers to be understood.