“Well mannered children in college. 17 and up. Porn doesn’t harm them. That’s what he said.”
No, that’s not what he said. That’s what YOU want people to believe that he said, but he never said that in his post.
“I’m someone’s child too, at age 64. The context he used it in was “young people”.”
No, he was asking someone specifically about if they were worried about their college aged children seeing pornography. That was the context, referring to someone’s offspring.
“Porn lovers cannot think rationally and lie. That’s the way it’s always been on these threads. Plus they all get very angry and aggressive.”
I don’t know, the only one I have seen trying to stir up conflict and lying about other posters is you, and you don’t seem to be a porn lover.
Boogieman - I appreciate it. I see now that someone has taken a portion of what I wrote and maybe expanded their own opinion atop it somewhere down the line.
That confusion is why it may have happened that someone thinks that I made declarative statements about the existence of a pornography addiction.
For the record, I did not write:
“Well mannered children in college. 17 and up. Porn doesn’t harm them. That’s what he said.”
“I’m someone’s child too, at age 64. The context he used it in was “young people”.”
“Porn lovers cannot think rationally and lie. That’s the way it’s always been on these threads. Plus they all get very angry and aggressive.”
Sorry, Boogieman, I just realized that I think I stumbled inbetween a post referring to something that you guys were already talking about and thought that what you wrote referred to something that had gotten laid on me. I was just confused.