You should be very grateful that FR allows you free rein to expound this crazy theory. No other respectable, mainstream site tolerates it. You can’t find a single credentialed investigator or researcher who embraces it. You haven’t turned up one single person who knew Mark Ndesandjo growing up who questions David’s existence. Not one. You claim extraordinary insight into the identification of online photos, but your recent spectacular misidentifications undercut that claim.
You’ve never been to Kenya. You’ve never interviewed a single person who knew Mark and/or the Ndesandjos during the years of David’s life. You refuse even to initiate email contact with anyone who knew David. It’s as if you know your theory can only exist in the fact free realm of online speculation. Any contact with real people who knew David in life would destroy it forever.
Not even TheObamaFile takes your theory seriously. FR is the only place on the entire Net, apart from a couple of NeoNazi-type freak sites, that allows this theory to be propounded...year after year. One hopes you are adequately grateful.
Oh, and even on FR, your ‘success’ depends on having an ever nasty henchman ready to attack anyone who disagrees with you. For some reason this is tolerated. But attacking personally anyone with an opposing view is not the same as winning an argument. It’s just strong arm bullying that a more respectable theorist would be ashamed to sanction.
With all due respect, you’re 100% off base. Why, I neither know nor care.
And this is the last comment I will make to you.
Someone made the following derogatory comment on this thread, and try as I might, I simply cannot ignore the falsehood.
You claim extraordinary insight into the identification of online photos, but your recent spectacular misidentifications undercut that claim.
A previous comment along the lines that I had TWICE IDENTIFIED A LIVE MAN AS A DEAD WOMAN lies behind it. Allow me to set the record straight:
Freepers were asked the question 'What Do You see?' and after many attempts, as the images posted were without captions and without identification, and after writing maybe that image is of Fuddy herself, I finally reached the conclusion that this above underwater image showed Fuddy's assistant Yamamoto supporting Fuddy, whose sleeve is showing in the image.
I reached the conclusion it was Fuddy's clothing that was showing by making a comparison of the sleeve of her jacket. One image from a photograph taken on the island before the event, one image taken from the aircraft interior which showed Fuddy seated, and then the final image, distorted and faint, of the sleeve I perceived in the water, which showed some of the same pattern.
I based this conclusion also on the above-the-water image, which shows, as Yamamoto described, him holding onto Fuddy, while her knees and one shoe are visible on the surface. Therefor, all that is visble of Fuddy in the underwater image is one arm clothed in the patterned sleeve.
And that was my limited, final contribution to the identification of the series of images which were posted to that thread.
I hope that settles any idea that I can't tell a live man from a dead woman. Twice. Wet or dry. Thank you.