That's a studio photograph of Ruth holding Mark which appeared in a recent biography. The child is obviously the product of a white mother and coloured father.
The above is an outdoor image identified by Mark in a video as being of his father, himself as the dark child, and his mother Ruth holding the mythical 'David'
Which is followed by the identification of the two little boys as 'David' and Mark.
Now put your thinking caps on. I've clearly shown that the little boy identified as 'David' is actually zero.
Mark was born in the year after Ruth arrived in Kenya, that makes his birth year 1965.
The two boys sitting there together are very close in age, probably born in the same year.
Yet the dark child Mark claims is he, is at least five years old in 1966. Which means he was born in the same year as zero was born, in 1961.
It's just not possible. If it's a mistake, we are entitled to ask for a correction. If it's not a mistake, if 'David' wasn't zero's twin, then there never was a 'David' - because that photograph shows someone else's dark child and zero sitting somewhere together - probably in Boston, where Stanley Ann Dunham told Susan Blake she was going that very same day of her visit, and where the kenyan student told his associates at Harvard he was visiting HIS SON - which created the impression amongst the faculty that the kenyan 'had another wife in Boston' according to the INS file.
The children, Mark who may not have known any better at the time, identified as himself and his brother 'David' are in all probability the child Mary babysat in January 1961 and the child whose identity isn't known because he has a fake birth certificate.
Name, date of birth, place of birth, names of parents UNKNOWN.
Who is the infant supposed to be?