I’ve done nothing to ‘smear’ Mark, I’m sure he has his own reasons for misindentifying the children in two photographs and then removing them from his website. Your inability to accept the fact doesn’t reflect on me in any way, it just makes you sound even more hysterical than usual.
A reasonable person might simply say, I don’t believe it. And leave it at that. It’s not compulsory that you see what we see.
The child Mark has identified as ‘David’ is actually zero.
That is never going to change.
You smear Mark when you claim it can’t identify his own brother. That is cruel and callous. He knows more about the identify of the child in the photo he posted than you do. He said the child was David, his brother. So you call him a liar. That is just not right.
Btw, Mark can be contacted online. You could ask him yourself why he “misidentified” his own brother. But if he didn’t, and that really is a photo of David, then the question would be vile and boorish, and way out of line. Nor do I believe anyone will actually ask him. The possibility of the truth—that it really is David—coming out is untenable to some. So on no account will Mark be given a chance to speak for himself.
And btw, you could also ask Mark firsthand why he deleted the photo. Wouldn’t it be better to let him explain it personally, than to put words in his mouth? You’ve tried so often to guess my motives, and you’ve been off a 180 degrees every single time. In a similar manner, you used to say Mark had deleted the pic because no one would believe it was his brother [though there is no evidence that this is the case]. Is it not possible you’re mistaken about Mark’s motives too? Why not let him explain himself? Wouldn’t that be best?