If you’d been reading the stellar research posted on FR since summer 2008, you would be neither as arrogance or ignorant as you are.
Since you bring it up, I have been “reading” the research concerning Obama’s origins since 2008 in a multitude of places, including on here. There is unlikely to be any element of such research that I haven’t at least seen as it has been a hobby that I have probably spent far too much time on.
I agree that much of that research here and elsewhere is indeed stellar. However it is also the case that much of it is totally absurd nonsense. The key is in how to assess which may be which. All of us, including you and me, appear to think we are very good at that lattermost part. The reality might well be that none of us are.
Making premature assumptions about anything or anyone, including other posters, on inadequate information, is never wise. You have absolutely nowhere near enough information about me to have any reliable basis on which to found an opinion as regards how much I already know about “Obama research” let alone as regards what intelligence or arrogance I may possess.