The woman is not SAD and the whoever the photographer was, there is not an atom of evidence linking FMD.....
don't be so sure..yes there was a debunking by loren C an Obot but he missed a few details..
and now how about some questions that I have not seen answered in response to the fotos
1 was Ann Dunham an au-pair in Chicago summer 1960 when she was 17?
2. was FMD in Chicago in summer 1960? He was married to Helen Canfield a trust fund baby from Chicago...could they have travelled to Chicago where FMD and Stanley Ann meet?
3. Were the risqueé pictures taken in Hawaii in a strange Tudor style house described as the only one like it or in a house in Chicago?
inquiring minds would like to know...
Were the risqueé pictures taken in Hawaii in a strange Tudor style house described as the only one like it or in a house in Chicago?
Not in FMD’s house in HI. And since some of the photos of the model (and some others) were printed in a magazine in 1958, it is obvious that SAD is not that model. Did you see the photo comparison posted above? Different chins, brow lines, etc. The model in 1958 is a grown woman. In 1958 SAD is a rather unattractive adolescent.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3130965/posts?page=166#166
THE HOUSE AT THE ADDRESS OF THE FALSE CAPTION