Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Nerks

LOL. You’d have to be blind to think the first and third images are of the same person. Funny.


1,111 posted on 05/04/2014 4:05:21 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1108 | View Replies ]


To: Plummz
Same woman left and right, Stanley Ann Dunham photographed in 1958, in the middle. You can deny it all you like, doesn't change anything.

Here she is again, next to Stanley Ann Dunham from a photograph of Stanley Ann that is supposedly from 1960:

The images of the model appeared in exotic magazines in the latter part of the fifties while Stanley Ann was living in Seattle with her parents.

1,112 posted on 05/04/2014 4:38:20 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1111 | View Replies ]

To: Plummz
Here she is again, same model, four times:

And if you still want anyone to believe this is Stanley Ann Dunham, you need more than glasses, you need to examine your motive.

1,113 posted on 05/04/2014 4:41:36 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1111 | View Replies ]

To: Plummz
Now it's your turn. Show me an image of the nude model in which she looks like Stanley Ann Dunham:


1,114 posted on 05/04/2014 7:27:06 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson