It’s like a game of ping pong. You can show some people what you see, but if they don’t want to see it, or it doesn’t fit their interpretation, then it just goes back and forth.
What remains however, is that the material they are using to establish something, isn’t worth the SCAN it’s written on.
Try to apply for a job with a scan. Or a driver’s licence with a scan of a COLB, for example.
The least Corsi should have asked for is a hard copy with a verification signed and sealed and delivered in an envelope!
A copy ditto of the ENROLLMENT for ANNA OBAMA whom Charlette Le Fevre indentified as Stanley Ann Dunham might have proven to be interesting. I believe enrollments included a PHOTOGRAPH of the student...
And that little space on the enrollment would be a blank by now, if it still exists...wanna bet?
The upside is that people who haven’t been following the research for years see good stuff; those who don’t want to see - DON’T MATTER!
:-D