[DiogenesLamp]

Once again, you don't strike me as someone who is educated enough or mentally astute enough to get yourself embroiled in this particular discussion. You seem too simple to grasp the concepts in play and prefer the simple explanations of the herd mentality.

You're not as dumb as Kansas58, but you're not nearly as smart or knowledgeable as Jeff either. (He is helped by the fact he's crazy, and he lies a lot.)

You should either do a lot of studying and pondering, or you should pick a topic more suited to your abilities.

[1rudeboy]

ping to #637

[Tau Food]

Once again, you don't strike me as someone who is educated enough or mentally astute enough to get yourself embroiled in this particular discussion. You seem too simple to grasp the concepts in play and prefer the simple explanations of the herd mentality.

Well, you're clearly some kind of genius, there's little question about that, but pardon me for wondering if you really know more about our original Constitution than William Rawle, the guy who wrote a treatise on our Constitution after working as a Philadelphia lawyer during the time that that city was hosting our Constitutional convention. As a contemporary and percipient witness to the preparation of our founding charter, I'm thinking that possibly Mr. Rawle might have gained some insights that have perhaps escaped your unique and peculiar genius. Do you think that's possible?

[Kansas58]

DL is a cerebral narcissist.
This does not that he IS smarter than everyone else.
It means only that he, himself is CONVINCED that he is smarter than everyone else.
He can not present a single, major Conservative or Liberal legal or lawsuit oriented political action committee like the Heritage Foundation or the Landmark Legal Foundation which agrees with him.
He can not name a single elected official anywhere in the country who supports his idiotic legal theories.
He can not point to a single Judge, anywhere, who agrees with him.
He can not point to a single immigration attorney, ANYWHERE who agrees with him.
He has not one, single legal scholar on his side.
And, he will now tell you that I am making the “argument from authority” error in logic, huh?
What is law, if not OPINION?
And he has no respected opinion on his side, at all.
NONE!