If you do find some holes in my reasoning, let me know. If I find they're legitimate holes, I will of course correct them.
If I wanted to go after you, I'd start with your assertions about Rawle. That would appear to be the shortest route. But these people can't be bothered with it. It's all "lies." And I'm a "troll" for pointing it out. Like I stated, a cult.
There are still some things I know biographically about Rawle that I've never even gotten around to writing about. He was an even better source than I've even written about.
No you won't, you'll ignore them, gloss over them, lie about them, but the one thing you certainly WON'T DO, is to "correct" them.
Why did we pass the 14th amendment Jeff?
There are still some things I know biographically about Rawle that I've never even gotten around to writing about. He was an even better source than I've even written about.
Really? Did you find out he was a SECRET delegate to the Convention? Or perhaps he was a SECRET member of one of the Ratifying legislatures? Pray tell us, where did Rawle get his inside information as to the intentions of the Legislators who debated article II?
Just what source of Information was Rawle privy to which makes him a BETTER source than ever?