“No, the court is not interested in hearsay witnesses such as yourself whose offer of “testimony” would be inadmissible hearsay, of course, but your knowledge of the law is so rudimentary you don’t understand this. You are no good to the court as either a primary OR as a secondary witness, based on what you have claimed so far.”
Eyewitness testimony of direct examination of a recorded document (secondary source) is not hearsay. It’s referred to as secondary source because the eyewitness does not possess or control the document. Anyone who has visited or worked in a U.S. Federal facility that houses documents protected by the Privacy Act know its impossible to make copies, photograph or record a document without specific authorization.
Obama’s foreign nationality status can corroborated by copies of the CLN from the State Department, Treasury Department, and the F.B.I. Additional evidence to corroborate Obama’s foreign nationality status can be obtained by examining his original Form SS-5, application for SSN, and his NUMIDENT file. Not to mention his complete tax returns for fiscal years 1979 to 1982 and his Occidential College applications and transcripts. And finally, his complete immigration file with his CERTIFICATE OF NATURALIZATION issued to him in 1983.
Securing these documents is not a fishing expedition to get something on Obama. It’s a concentrated effort to corroborate the specific allegation that Obama is not eligible for the Office of the President because he was a foreign national in 1971 through 1983 where he regained his U.S. citizenship status with the issuance of a Certificate of Naturalization in 1983.
Postscript: And the records from Office of Refugee Resettlement at HHS and Catholic Social Services of Connecticut which further corroborate Obama’s foreign nationality status.
“Eyewitness testimony of direct examination of a recorded document (secondary source) is not hearsay. It’s referred to as secondary source because the eyewitness does not possess or control the document. Anyone who has visited or worked in a U.S. Federal facility that houses documents protected by the Privacy Act know its impossible to make copies, photograph or record a document without specific authorization.”
Under the FRE there is a hearsay exception for the custodians of official records who are government employees action in an official capacity, such as those who work in a US document retention facility. You have not yet claimed to be such a person.
If a plaintiff’s case gets dismissed on a motion for summary judgment or motion to dismiss due to lack of jurisdiction or standing preceded by a general answer requiring no rebuttal of plaintiff’s specific claims, then there is no trial, no discovery and no evidence or witness testimony placed before the court. So no primary or “secondary” witness testimony from employees or custodians at US document facilities would be allowed.